| Customization: | Available |
|---|---|
| Shaping Mode: | Injection Mould |
| Surface Finish Process: | Polishing |
|
Still deciding? Get samples of $ !
Request Sample
|
Suppliers with verified business licenses
Audited Supplier Audited by an independent third-party inspection agency
| Product Name | Professional Making High Quality Plastic auto parts mold |
| Product material | PP |
| Core&Cavity Steel | p20/718/2738 |
| Steel hardness: | HRC35-38 |
| Mould Standard | DME,HASCO,etc |
| Cavity Number | single |
| Injection System | Valve gate |
| Ejector System | Ejector pin |
| Cycle Time | 80-100S |
| Tooling lead time | 70DAYS |
| Mould life | 5000,000SHOTS |
| Quality assurance | ISO9001 |
| Specification | According to client's requirements |
"The power of injection-molded bumpers lies in the fact that no alternative process can match or surpass its overall performance across all five of these aspects:
Metal (Steel/Aluminum): Shows clear disadvantages in cost (material & manufacturing), lightweighting, design freedom (complex curves/functional integration), and pedestrian protection.
SMC (Sheet Molding Compound): Falls short of injection molding in efficiency (long cycle times), design freedom (details/thin walls), recyclability, and surface finishability (often requiring a primer coat).
Thermosetting Plastics/Composites: Suffer from low efficiency, difficulty in recycling (thermosetting nature), and typically higher costs (especially carbon fiber).
3D Printing: Currently suitable only for prototypes or very low volumes; its cost, efficiency, and material performance (especially impact resistance and weatherability) are far from meeting mass production requirements.
){kind=link}